Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński

  • Bio
    • My bio
    • My works
    • Video
    • Karate
  • Conferences
    • AAEV – Berlin
    • AAEV – Opole
    • World Congresses
    • Other
  • Berlin Forum
  • Contact
  • Santayana Guide
    • Table of Contents
    • Introduction
    • Problems and Issues
    • Disciplines
  • Philosophy
    • Pragmatist Kant
  • Digital Time Coaching
  • Español
    • Gombrowicz Argentino
    • Cursos en español
  • Students
    • FAQ – Philosophy Course
    • Online Courses
    • 2004-2024

Multiculturalism Classes at Opole Summer University 2019

28 September 2019 by Krzysztof Skowroński Leave a Comment

Dr Chris Skowronski’s Classes for students from China Mainland, Hong-Kong, and Taiwan

Multiculturalism has many meanings. Most frequently perhaps, it means that you have many ethnicities, cultures, religions, identities, and languages side by side in your country. Indeed, there are many countries that are multicultural in this sense, yet their governments do not have any multiculturalist policy according to the idea of multiculturalism. For example, it happens when you have many languages that are used by the citizens of your country, yet university studies are possible only in one. Or, another example, males and females having the same status (e.g. students) do not have access to the same goods and ways of self-realization. So, what is the meaning of ‘multiculturalism’ we are going to discuss during our classes? We will talk about multiculturalism as

a body of thought in political philosophy about the proper way to respond to cultural and religious diversity (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, entry: “Multiculturalism”; accessible on the Internet; I recommend taking a look at preferable parts of this text).

The basic discussion of this definition may include the following issues:

1. “proper”: what does it mean ‘proper’ in this definition? Most frequently, the ideas of ‘freedom’ (positive freedom, negative freedom) and ‘social justice’ must be discussed.

2. “way to respond”: what is the character of the ‘way to respond’? If this means a governmental or legal action, it should be preceded by a theoretical discussion so that all the aspects could be shared with public opinion. Perhaps, this is why the definition above starts with the expression: “a body of thought in political philosophy.”

3 “cultural and religious diversity”: each diversity has its limits as toleration has, and discussion about these limits is central to the problem.

            More generally, the idea of multiculturalism has a strong connection with Western and European values of rationalism, democracy, freedom, social justice, toleration, and activity; it’s main practical aim is to recognize and promote:

  • The cultural and racial diversity of the given state/country/region
  • Language diversity of this state (if its citizens use many languages)
  • Religious toleration (freedom to practice and freedom not to practice a given religion)
  • Active participation of various groups and individuals in socio-political life
  • Inclusion (not exclusion) of different groups into socio-political life
  • Harmonization (not repression) of various groups that co-exist in one state

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana, Philosophy, Students

Viadrina University Talk about Stoic Pragmatism

15 July 2019 by Krzysztof Skowroński Leave a Comment

see the material here

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana, Digital Time Coaching

A Webinar with J. Lachs: Video

31 December 2017 by Krzysztof Skowroński Leave a Comment

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana

Webinar with John Lachs

26 November 2017 by Krzysztof Skowroński Leave a Comment

An online seminar with John Lachs took place on Saturday, November 18, 2017. John Lachs is an educator and the author of numerous books on American philosophy, especially American pragmatism, on Santayana, and the practical implementation of philosophy into life. This online seminar follows the online seminar about his text “The Quality of Life,” October 5, 2017, during which we discussed the relationship between various aspects of happiness, satisfaction and self-fulfilment in the context of the quality of life and standards of living. The video material from the online seminar we hope to present soon.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana

Stikkers and Skowroński’s new book

16 October 2017 by Krzysztof Skowroński Leave a Comment

PHILOSOPHY IN THE TIME OF ECONOMIC CRISIS. London and New York: Routledge

Contents:

I. The Crisis in Philosophical and Historical Perspective

1. Philosophy and the Crisis of Economic Science, by Kenneth W. Stikkers (Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA)

2. On the Shadow and the Substance: Adam Smith, John Dewey, and the Great Recession, by Michael Schleeter (Pacific Lutheran University, USA)

3. John Dewey: A Philosophy for Times of Crisis, by Matteo Santarelli (Unversity of Molise, Italy)

II. The Narrative and Rhetoric of ‘Crisis’

4. Neopragmatist Ethnocentric Rhetoric on Economic Crisis: Richard Rorty and Social Amelioration by Redescription, by Krzysztof Piotr Skowroński (Opole University, Poland)

5. If Philosophers Are So Smart: A Metaphor of ‘Global Economic Crisis’, by Maja Niestrόj (Opole University, Poland)

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana

Santayana on Aesthetics

17 June 2017 by Krzysztof Skowroński 1 Comment

Santayana on Aesthetics. Santayana was one of the first to teach aesthetics at an American university (the1892-93 course at Harvard, The Sense of Beauty being one of the results). He devoted three books and many papers and chapters on aesthetic themes, yet all his studies served him to create his own position (to be described in Santayana Guide’s Part 10: Aesthetics, Arts, and Literary Figures). His views on aesthetics, as on philosophy in general, stem from his own elaborated system of thought that combines the elements of naturalism, individualism, pragmatism, and Platonism. It is predominantly by means of the categories of his own aesthetics that he provides us with his interpretations in this field as well as on the arts, aesthetic perception, work of art, criticism, on many artists and philosophies of art. Hence, it is difficult to separate Santayana’s views on aesthetics from looking at aesthetics from his own perspective. Interestingly, Santayana was specific on having adumbrated, at least thematically, most of his plots before he developed them in his numerous publications (cf. Ahmore 1966, 25). His thoughts and ideas were implemented also in his own art, which is poetry, literature (he wrote two best-sellers), and criticism.

[Read more…]

Filed Under: Blog on Santayana, Disciplines Tagged With: Aesthetics, Santayana

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next Page »
Chris Skowronski

Entries

abulense Aesthetics Argentina art barbarism cartoon civilization Consumption Education Fanaticism filozofia praktyczna Gombrowicz History of Philosophy Humanism injustice John Lachs justice Love Mujica Music Nietzsche philosophy Philosophy of education Politics practical philosophy pragmatism Richard Rorty Santayana Sanyayana Travel values

Archives

Recent Posts

  • W. Gombrowicz, C. Miłosz
  • Oxford Handbook of Santayana: Announcement at Santayana Society Meeting (Jan 25, 2026)
  • Seminario: La escritura constitucional de Europa
  • Merry Christmas 2025
  • Skowroński – The George Santayana Society European Liaison

Recent Comments

  • Pete on Santayana on Aesthetics
  • Krzysztof Skowroński on Santayana on Fanaticism
  • inenun on Santayana on Fanaticism

Archives

By using this site you agree to the placement of cookies on your computer.

Copyright © 2026 · Genesis Sample Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Follow via Twitter Mail to